Citation: Morninggloryseed. "Dissapointing Cognitive Enhancer: An Experience with 2C-D (exp34397)". Erowid.org. Jun 15, 2004. erowid.org/exp/34397
| T+ 2:15
| T+ 2:24
I measured out fifty-milligrams of 2C-D. It was a fluffy, gleaming-white powder and I dissolved that into ten-milliliters of distilled, sterile water. This was held in a glass vial for ease of use and measurement. The 2C-D almost immediately went into solution and required no heat and just a little shaking for the crystals to dissolve.
Monday, May 3, 2004
5:53 PM: Measuring with a syringe, I draw up one-milliliter of the solution, containing five-milligrams of 2C-D. This experiment is to better understand and experience this molecule’s alleged “smart-drug properties” for a future study I plan on conducting. It has a slightly bitter flavor, but it isn’t bad at all.
6:19 PM: Definitely feeling an alert. Difficult to define. I feel a kind of warmth in the chest, and the knowledge that I have taken something. Not really stimulating, just warm.
6:40 PM: At this point, the effects seem to be fully developed. I guess I am at a plus/minus on the “Shulgin scale.” There is warmth in the chest and a slight increased interest in activities I am doing. But there is nothing that I feel to really consider this state one of cognitive-enhancement
. I felt more from piracetam when I took that, and find d,l-amphetamine to be a much better study aid then this. There are no amphetamine-like feelings with five-milligrams of 2C-D.
7:03 PM: Not much more than before. It’s been well over an hour. From my prior experience with 2C-D, I know this is as far as it is going to go. I would describe this as a “buzz” really more than anything else. I am perhaps at a mild plus-one.
7:19 PM: I just read an essay given to me by an on-line acquaintance. I found the 2C-D seemed
to increase my interest in reading the work, but I can not honestly say it wasn’t also just a placebo result. There is no truly discernible activity beyond the “phenethylamine body-buzz” that is occurring. I do not notice any real cognitive-enhancement
or “smart-drug properties.”
7:34 PM: Much of the same. If there is any cognitive-enhancement, it is simply because I can feel a small amount of a psychedelic in my body and thus I am more alert. But there are no real psychedelic effects at this level. All I feel is just the warm feeling in the chest, and perhaps now some mild stimulation. But not like d,l-amphetamine stimulation. I have no desire to work, or do anything productive. I just feel a little “uppity” as if I’ve had too much coffee.
8:07 PM: Again, much of the same. A nice warm body-buzz, but none of the cognitive-enhancement said to be the hallmark of lower 2C-D dosages. But there is also some slight stimulation now and a tiny bit of nausea. But it is more annoying that anything. And the stimulation is not like d,l-amphetamine produces. I do not feel productive or have any desire to work. It just feels like the comedown of a psychedelic. I am hoping pot helps this. This experiment “finished” and I shall smoke some cannabis to relax.
8:15 PM: Just took a balloon of nitrous oxide and the experience was short, but very
intense. I know the 2C-D enhanced the effects of the gas, however as the nitrous wore off I did not notice anymore residual effects from the 2C-D. The cannabis did not increase any effects either. Five-milligrams of 2C-D is definitely a sub-threshold psychedelic dosage, but I bet it would increase the effects and add a little “flavor” at this level if mixed with another psychedelic.
9:00 PM: I don’t really feel anything left at all anymore, and I am going to go out and visit with friends.
The main reason I did this experiment was that I want to conduct a study testing 2C-D against a few other molecules in a controlled environment to see if 2C-D shows any unique cognitive-enhancing properties. I felt that I needed to know what a “smart drug” level was like personally to conduct this study. I also needed to experience this molecule at the five-milligram level because I must now find the equipotent dosages of the other psychedelic phenethylamines I plan to use in my experiment for verifying if 2C-D does show cognitive-enhancing properties.
I personally did not find that 2C-D was a “smart-drug” at five-milligrams. But I also did not take any cognitive tests before and during the experiment to really see by scientifically acceptable standards. I simply went by what I felt. I think d,l-amphetamine is a much better tool for concentration because it actually works for me at a five-milligram dosage in keeping me focused, and there is no nausea from d,l-amphetamine. Maybe the “smart drug” properties are different in nature than what d,l-amphetamine does, but I felt nothing either way that could qualify as cognitive-enhancement
I also feel if I had increased the dosage of 2C-D to ten-milligrams, psychedelic effects would begin. And smaller dosages would probably have less “smart drug” properties (if any) than what I took. So, I am not personally comfortable with calling 2C-D a “smart-drug,” but I will wait and see what the results are when I test it with other people.
COPYRIGHTS: All reports are copyright Erowid and you agree not to download or analyze the report data without contacting Erowid Center and receiving permission first.
Experience Reports are the writings and opinions of the individual authors who submit them.
Some of the activities described are dangerous and/or illegal and none are recommended by Erowid Center.