Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs From: email@example.com (Greg Wickham) Subject: Fight the pee-sniffers! Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 1994 19:44:15 GMT Hi Y'all! I just pulled this off of alt.privacy, and this guy seems to have a good approach to company drug testing. Even if you end up peeing for them like a good boy or girl, this is a way you can make them THINK about what they're doing, without appearing to be filthy lowlife drug-using scum. If they're going to turn this once-great country into an armed camp full of nosy, distrustful pee-sniffers, let's at least make 'em WORK for it! > I'm a computer consultant and have successfully fought the drug test question > by reverse intimidation. I start asking questions that "they" aren't prepared > to answer. > > - What is the name and address of the lab that will perform the test ? > > - EXACTY what test or tests are to be used ? > > - For each test performed, list the type and quantity of specimens required ? > > - For each test performed, list the percentages for false positive and false > negative results. > > - Provide statistical justification for these percentages. > > - In the case of a false positive, what are the established procedures for > retesting ? > > - How many times will retesting be permitted ? > > - What is the established procedures for resolving consistant false positive > results ? > > - What facility is going to extract the specimen(s) ? > > - How much of each type of specimen is going to be extracted ? > > - Are the lab and the blood extraction facility bonded ? > > - What company carries their malpractice insurance and what are their policy > numbers ? > > - EXACTLY what information will be release from the lab to the employer ? > > - It is required that all results be forwarded to me. > > - The employer is required to pay all costs involved, including those if > retesting is required. > > By this time, any reasonable person will be thinking that maybe drug testing > isn't something in which they want to become involved. > > I've thought of having a lawyer (or myself) prepare a "Request for Drug Test" > form in proper legalese. Along with a paragraph swearing, under penalty of > perjury that all information is complete and correct. So far, that hasn't > been necessary.